The relation between Hume’s treatment of miracles and his understanding of sacramental theology is a question worth investigating. Hume’s skepticism about miracles (and the similar sentiments of his contemporaries) in turn helped launch the movement in biblical studies dedicated to discovering naturalistic explanations for the miracles recorded in the Gospels-a movement justly mocked by Albert Schweitzer. What, for example, are we to make of the fact that David Hume began his treatise on miracles with a discussion of Scottish eucharistic doctrine? In the course of that treatise, Hume claimed that miracles were impossible to prove-a maxim he applied even to the miracles of Jesus. The notion that such a history would be worth writing might seem quaint in our day, but there are hints that the enterprise would be a fruitful one. Thus it is not only a simple sign or symbol among Christians but rather a divine symbol and work which supports our faith, through which we are born again to life.A history of the relation of sacramental theology and practice to Western intellectual and cultural history has yet to be written. Ninth, that holy baptism is a sacrament which is an instrument of God for such faith and ordered by Him: “Go forth and baptize”, and God promises thereby: “He who believes ”. Rather, it works through and with such oral proclamation and creates faith where and in whom it wishes. Thus, we are allowed to take part in and enjoy the Son’s salvation, life, and all things.Įighth, that the Holy Spirit, to speak properly, does not give anyone such faith or this gift without their having heard sermons or the Word or Gospel of Christ. We are thereby saved from sin and death, granted mercy and made holy for the sake of his Son, in whom we believe. Seventh, such faith is our justification before God, on which basis he accounts us saved, pious, and holy without works or merit. Rather, it comes from and is created by the Holy Spirit, wherever it pleases, when we hear the Gospel or the words of Christ. Sixth, such faith is a divine gift which we cannot earn with works or merit nor create of our own accord. Without this faith no deed, social status, or religious order, etc., can free us from our sins. Without him we would have been lost for eternity and excluded from God's kingdom and salvation.įifth, we believe that we are saved from this sin and all other sin and eternal death if we believe in the Son of God, Jesus Christ, who died for us. It is so egregious that all of humanity would be damned had not Jesus Christ come to help with his life and death. Third, that very same Son of God and Mary, one in body, Jesus Christ, was crucified for us, died and was buried, rose from the dead, ascended into heaven, sits to the right of God, Lord of all creation, and will judge the living and the dead.įourth, we believe that we are born with and inherited original sin from Adam. He was perfect in body and soul, and like other men but utterly free of sin. Second, we believe that neither the Father nor the Holy Spirit, but rather the Son of God the Father became man through the agency of the Holy Spirit without male seed and born of the immaculate Virgin Mary. , that this God is one in being and nature in the three persons of the Trinity, namely the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, etc, as resolved at the Nicene Council and sung and read in the Nicene Creed by the Christian Church throughout the entire world. The following articles were written and signed in Marburg on October 3, 1529.įirst, that we both sides unanimously believe and hold that there is one single, correct, natural God, Creator of all living things. The split eventually led to two Protestant confessions, one Lutheran and the other Reformed (sometimes called “Calvinist”). As neither party felt bound by them, the articles had no effect on the quarrel, which broadened into a schism within what had been a united party. This strategy, which was meant to contain the chief source of the conflict, in fact probably expanded the range of the quarrel and made it easier for both sides to make and maintain their charges of heresy. The central issue, the Eucharist, is treated in the final and longest article (Article 15), which acknowledges the lack of full agreement and includes a pledge to tolerance until the matter could be finally settled. It documents how an affair that began with a quarrel about the doctrine of the literal Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist (Luther for, Zwingli against) led to a joint statement that touched on all of the leading doctrinal points. This text contains the articles of the agreement signed at Marburg by Luther, Zwingli, and eight other preachers. The Marburg Colloquy – The Marburg Articles (1529) From the Reformation to the Thirty Years War (1500-1648)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |